A survey that organizes KV cache optimization into eviction, compression, hybrid memory, novel attention, and combined strategies. It is a useful map of the current KV-cache field, which has become the core bottleneck for long-context inference.
This is the map page behind GPU Hunter's long-context recommendations: more VRAM helps, but cache policy decides whether that VRAM is enough.
03 // why GPU Hunter includes it
It is a useful map of the current KV-cache field, which has become the core bottleneck for long-context inference. The useful part for GPU Hunter readers is not the abstract result alone; it is the hardware implication: whether a model fits, whether a runtime can use the format, or whether throughput is limited by memory movement instead of arithmetic.
04 // local inference implications
Use this to decide whether a workload needs cache compression, offload, eviction, or a hybrid policy before buying more VRAM. For long-context work, KV cache behavior is often the constraint that shows up after the model weights already fit. Cache precision, eviction, reuse, and memory movement can change the practical value of the same GPU.
05 // key findings for hardware decisions
# KV-cache work splits into eviction, compression, hybrid memory, and attention changes.
# Each strategy solves a different memory-pressure pattern.
# A long-context deployment should pick cache policy before buying extra VRAM.
06 // what it means for GPU choice
Use this paper when comparing GeForce RTX 3090, Apple M4 Max, RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell. The key question is whether extra VRAM, memory bandwidth, or cache-aware runtime support gives the better long-context result.
This page is GPU Hunter editorial context and does not reproduce the paper abstract. Use the original arXiv, PDF, and Hugging Face links for the complete paper text and author-provided details.